DO MAKE USE of LINKS,
Greg Lance – Watkins
having had my VERY enlarged Prostate [Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)] operated on on Tuesday I was waiting to be TWOCed (Trial Without Catheter) on Wednesday morning in a hospital bed when the hospital paper trolley came round and the front page headline was:
Prostate therapy without surgery: Thousands of men to benefit from new technique that uses plastic beads to block blood supply and shrink the enlarged gland
- Successful trial in Portugal being followed up in UK with results due this year
- If it is successful the technique could be rolled out for routine use on the NHS
- Researchers expect it to largely replace surgery as the standard treatment
By Ben Spencer
Published: 05:00, 8 March 2017 | Updated: 08:19, 8 March 2017
Tens of thousands of men could benefit from a breakthrough prostate treatment announced today.
The technique uses tiny plastic beads to block the blood supply and shrink the enlarged gland – all without an operation.
A successful trial in Portugal is being followed up in Britain, with results due back later this year. If successful it could be rolled out for routine use on the NHS.
Half of all men over 50 suffer from an enlarged prostate and every year 45,000 have risky surgery to remove part of it.
As well as being painful and invasive, the operation can cause loss of sexual function and even incontinence.
The technique uses tiny plastic beads to block the blood supply and shrink the enlarged gland – all without an operation
Last night, researchers said they expected the new technique – prostate artery embolisation – to largely replace surgery as the standard treatment.
An enlarged prostate presses on the bladder, while also blocking the urethra. This means sufferers need to make repeated night-time trips to the toilet, often to find they cannot urinate at all.
This can lead to a build-up of toxins that cause severe kidney problems. The bead technique has been tested on 1,000 middle-aged men in Portugal.
Joao Martins Pisco, who led the study at St Louis Hospital in Lisbon, said: ‘Within five years I think this will replace surgery as the standard treatment.
‘Prostate artery embolisation gives men a treatment option that is less invasive than other therapies and allows them to return to their normal lives sooner.
Time and time again, I see patients who are relieved to find out about prostate artery embolisation because they are not able to tolerate medications due to their side effects.
‘These men also don’t want traditional surgery because it involves greater risks, has possible sexual side effects, and has a recovery time that is relatively long compared to prostate artery embolisation, which is generally performed under local anaesthesia and on an outpatient basis.’
The Portuguese team, which will present its findings at the Society of Interventional Radiology in Washington DC today, concluded the procedure is as effective as surgery and the benefits may last as long.
Half of all men over 50 suffer from an enlarged prostate and every year 45,000 have risky surgery to remove part of it
Only two patients in the seven-year trial had clinical side effects.
Performed under local anaesthetic, the procedure involves injecting hundreds of 0.2mm plastic beads into an artery in the groin.
The beads are directed with a thin tube into the blood vessels that flow to the prostate, blocking blood supply to the enlarged gland so that it shrinks.
Dr Pisco added: ‘I have had nine babies born to men who were able to continue their sex lives after having the treatment.’
His team saw a 89 per cent success rate six months after surgery, 82 per cent success up to three years, and 78 per cent beyond three years.
Two hundred patients in Southampton General, Guy’s Hospital in London and 16 other clinics are involved in the British trial, which is part-funded by the clinical watchdog NICE.
Dr Nigel Hacking, who is leading the study, said: ‘It is very encouraging. I am always cautious about new techniques but this procedure seems to be showing promise and it seems to be safe.’
Louise de Winter of the Urology Foundation said: ‘This research is very exciting.
‘As the population ages these problems are going to get even more acute.’
An estimated 45,000 men undergo surgery for enlarged prostates every year in the UK.
Dr Pisco claims most of these could be replaced by prostate artery embolisation – although others say the less invasive procedure is not be suitable for all men, and many will have to continue to have surgery.
Two hundred patients in Southampton General (pictured) Guy’s Hospital in London and 16 other clinics are involved in the British trial
Dr Hacking said that in his own experience, roughly 40 per cent of patients who have embolisation later have to undergo operations.
But having initial embolisation may enable them to delay that operation while retaining sexual function, and this usually means that when they do come to have an operation it is less invasive and there is a lower risk of side effects.
‘Even if they do need to go back and have surgery it’s a smaller operation,’ he said.
Dr Hacking said it was unlikely the procedure will completely replace surgery, because it requires a highly trained interventional radiologist.
‘It is a fiddly procedure and it would be potentially dangerous for someone without the skills to do it,’ he said.
‘But I think it may give men another option alongside surgery.’
Surgery, conducted either with a hot wire or lasers, have a high success rate – but they come with side effects which can include loss of sexual function, bleeding and incontinence.
The symptoms of enlarged prostate include a frequent need to urinate, but also difficulty starting to urinate and difficulty fully emptying a bladder.
These symptoms, however, also might be a sign of prostate cancer, so anyone in this way should be seen by a urologist.
To view the original article CLICK HERE
March 9 2017, 12:01am
Doctors have welcomed an “exciting” technique that could spare tens of thousands of men surgery for an uncomfortable prostate problem.
The NHS treatments adviser is studying closely a procedure that injects tiny plastic beads into arteries to block blood flow to the prostate after research found it safe and effective.
About half of older men have an enlarged prostate. Although it is not a serious health threat, sufferers have problems urinating and their nights are disrupted by frequent lavatory visits.
Medication is often used and an estimated 45,000 men a year are offered surgery to cut away part of the prostate and relieve the pressure of the gland against the urethra.
This requires at least a night in hospital. It also often requires several weeks of recuperation and carries the risk of complications.
Now a trial of 1,000 men has found that the less invasive method of starving the prostate appears to be as good as surgery.
Success rates were 89 per cent after six months, 82 per cent after more than a year and 78 per cent after more than three years, researchers told the Society of Interventional Radiology in Washington yesterday. Only two patients suffered side-effects such as pain.
João Martins Pisco, who led the study at St Louis Hospital in Lisbon, told the Daily Mail: “Within five years I think this will replace surgery as the standard treatment. Prostate artery embolisation gives men a treatment option that is less invasive than other therapies and allows them to return to their normal lives sooner.
“Time and time again, I see patients who are relieved to find out about prostate artery embolisation because they are not able to tolerate medications due to their side-effects.
“These men also don’t want traditional surgery because it involves greater risks, has possible sexual side effects, and has a recovery time that is relatively long compared to prostate artery embolisation, which is generally performed under local anaesthesia and on an outpatient basis.”
A British trial is under way with help from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice), which will look at whether the method should be routine on the NHS. Nigel Hacking, of University Hospitals Southampton, who is leading the British research, said: “It is very encouraging. I am always cautious about new techniques but this procedure seems to be showing promise and it seems to be safe.”
Louise de Winter, of the Urology Foundation, said: ‘This research is very exciting. As the population ages these problems are going to get even more acute.”
Last year Nice approved a laser treatment for enlarged prostates to destroy excess tissue, achieving the same results as surgery but allowing men to spend a third less time in hospital.
To view the original article CLICK HERE
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked
All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.
‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com
ABOUT ME, Details & Links: CLICK HERE
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Summary & archive, facts & comments on Ukip: http://Ukip-vs-EUkip.com
General ‘Stuff’: http://GL-W.com
Leave-The-EU Referendum & BreXit Process CLICK HERE
Documents, Essays & Treaties: CLICK HERE
The Hamlet of Stroat: CLICK HERE
Data & The Study of a Wind Turbine Application: CLICK HERE
Health Blog.: CLICK HERE
Chepstow Chat: CLICK HERE
Christopher Story: CLICK HERE
Des Watkins DFC; CdeG: CLICK HERE/
Hollie Greig etc.: CLICK HERE
Psycheocracy: CLICK HERE
The McCann Case: CLICK HERE
The Speculative Society of Edinburgh: CLICK HERE
Stolen Kids, Dunblane: CLICK HERE
Stolen Kids, Bloggers: CLICK HERE
Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
A Concept of Governance Worthy of Developement: CLICK HERE
- I NEVER post anonymously on the internet
- ALL MY BLOGS & WEB SITES are clearly sourced to me
- I do NOT use an obfuscated eMail address to hide behind
- I do NOT use or bother reading FaceBook
- I DO have a Voice Mail Message System
- I ONLY GUARANTEE to answer identifiable eMails
- I ONLY GUARANTEE to phone back identifiable UK Land Line Messages
- I do NOT accept phone calls from witheld numbers
- I Regret due to BT in this area I have a rubbish Broadband connection
- I AM opposed to British membership of The EU
- I AM opposed to Welsh, Scottish or English Independence within an interdependent UK
- I am NOT a WARMIST
- I do NOT believe the IPCC Climate Propaganda re Anthropogenic Global Warming
- I AM strongly opposed to the subsidy or use of failed technologies eg. WIND TURBINES
- I AM IN FAVOUR of rapid research & development of NEW NUCLEAR technologies
- I see no evidence to trust POLITICIANS at any level or of any persuasion
- I do NOT believe in GODS singular or plural, Bronze Age or Modern
- I value the NHS as a HEALTH SERVICE NOT a Lifestyle support
- I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial or GBH rape.
- I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial, terrorist, mass or for pleasure murder.
- I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial gross child abuse including sexual.
- I do NOT trust or believe in armed police
- I do NOT believe in prolonging human life beyond reasonable expectation of sentient participatory intellectual existence
- I believe in EUTHENASIA under clearly defined & legal terms
- I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual
Re-TWEET my Twitterings