Greg Lance – Watkins
Far fewer men being treated for prostate cancer
(Reuters Health) – The number of older Americans treated for prostate cancer plummeted 42 percent since health officials began questioning the benefits of screening tests, a new study shows.
The finding points to the success of efforts to curtail the use of controversial prostate-specific antigen, or PSA, screening tests, said lead author Dr. Tudor Borza.
At the same time, his team found, doctors still face challenges trying to convince men diagnosed with early-stage prostate cancer to watch and wait before undergoing surgery or other invasive treatment, Borza said.
From 2007 to 2012, Medicare data showed a relatively meager 8 percent drop in the number of men who were treated immediately after a prostate cancer diagnosis, Borza’s team reports in Health Affairs.
Borza, a urologist and research fellow at the University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor, said he feared the statistics might mean that too few men are being screened, and among those who do get a prostate cancer diagnosis, too few are following the strategy of watchful waiting and surveillance recommended by urologists for early-stage tumors.
“I believe more men should be screened,” Borza said in a phone interview. “A diagnosis of prostate cancer shouldn’t necessarily lead to treatment.”
A PSA test measures the amount of a protein known as prostate-specific antigen in a man’s blood. Often, however, the test falsely signals possible cancer, causing anxiety and leading to unnecessary, invasive and sometimes debilitating procedures.
Moreover, many men are likely to die of other causes before slow-growing prostate cancer harms them. But once they’ve been diagnosed with prostate cancer, men frequently elect to be treated and can suffer punishing side effects, including impotence and incontinence.
“Diagnosis has a way of begetting treatment, whether or not it warrants treatment,” said Dr. Gilbert Welch, professor of medicine at the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice in Lebanon, New Hampshire. He was not involved with the new study.
“Patients think once cancer is there, you’ve got to act,” Welch said in a phone interview. “The question is whether you want to be looking for early forms of cancer.”
Borza and Welch both believe the decision should be left to individual men. But the two physicians approach the question from differing perspectives. Borza’s interest in continuing to screen men for prostate cancer with PSA tests generally aligns with other urologists, and Welch’s preference for less screening aligns with other primary-care physicians.
In 2008, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) advised against routine PSA testing of men older than 75. By 2011, the government-backed panel of independent physicians recommended against all PSA screening, warning that the benefits do not outweigh the harms.
The American Urological Association, however, recommends that men weigh the benefits and harms of PSA screening in conversations with their doctors and finds the greatest value to screening in 55 to 69 year olds.
Borza and his team analyzed Medicare data and identified more than 67,000 men age 66 and older who were diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2007 and 2012. During the same period, the population-based rate for men treated for prostate cancer dropped 42 percent, from 4.3 per 100,000 men to 2.5 per 100,000, the study shows.
Nearly three-quarters of the men diagnosed with prostate cancer had curative treatment, such as surgery or radiation, within a year, while 17 percent instead opted for “watchful waiting” or “active surveillance,” the study found.
Most of the men diagnosed with prostate cancer were between 66 and 75 years old, but nearly 16 percent were 80 and older – too old to likely benefit from treatment, according to the USPSTF guidelines.
Men are much more likely to die with prostate cancer than from it, Welch said.
“The question is whether you want to be looking for early forms of cancer,” he said. “There’s no limit to how much data we can collect, but that doesn’t mean we want all that information. It can lead people down a rabbit hole.”
Borza sees it differently.
“Information is power,” he said. “Knowing where you stand allows you to make the best decisions.”
Nonetheless, he acknowledges that deciding whether and how to treat an early-stage prostate cancer diagnosed after a PSA test can be an agonizing decision. And no one can say how many lives might be saved by treating those cancers.
Borza recommends men consider getting PSA tests at 50 years old. But, he said, “It is a very difficult decision for a man to make. There’s not a great answer.”
To view the original of this article CLICK HERE
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked
All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.
‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com
ABOUT ME, Details & Links: CLICK HERE
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Summary & archive, facts & comments on Ukip: http://Ukip-vs-EUkip.com
General ‘Stuff’: http://GL-W.com
Leave-The-EU Referendum & BreXit Process CLICK HERE
Documents, Essays & Treaties: CLICK HERE
The Hamlet of Stroat: CLICK HERE
Data & The Study of a Wind Turbine Application: CLICK HERE
Health Blog.: CLICK HERE
Chepstow Chat: CLICK HERE
Christopher Story: CLICK HERE
Des Watkins DFC; CdeG: CLICK HERE/
Hollie Greig etc.: CLICK HERE
Psycheocracy: CLICK HERE
The McCann Case: CLICK HERE
The Speculative Society of Edinburgh: CLICK HERE
Stolen Kids, Dunblane: CLICK HERE
Stolen Kids, Bloggers: CLICK HERE
Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
A Concept of Governance Worthy of Developement: CLICK HERE
Stolen Kids Blogs with links:
Stolen Oyster with links:
Stolen Trust with links:
Stolen Childhood with links:
- I NEVER post anonymously on the internet
- ALL MY BLOGS & WEB SITES are clearly sourced to me
- I do NOT use an obfuscated eMail address to hide behind
- I do NOT use or bother reading FaceBook
- I DO have a Voice Mail Message System
- I ONLY GUARANTEE to answer identifiable eMails
- I ONLY GUARANTEE to phone back identifiable UK Land Line Messages
- I do NOT accept phone calls from witheld numbers
- I Regret due to BT in this area I have a rubbish Broadband connection
- I AM opposed to British membership of The EU
- I AM opposed to Welsh, Scottish or English Independence within an interdependent UK
- I am NOT a WARMIST
- I do NOT believe the IPCC Climate Propaganda re Anthropogenic Global Warming
- I AM strongly opposed to the subsidy or use of failed technologies eg. WIND TURBINES
- I AM IN FAVOUR of rapid research & development of NEW NUCLEAR technologies
- I see no evidence to trust POLITICIANS at any level or of any persuasion
- I do NOT believe in GODS singular or plural, Bronze Age or Modern
- I value the NHS as a HEALTH SERVICE NOT a Lifestyle support
- I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial or GBH rape.
- I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial, terrorist, mass or for pleasure murder.
- I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial gross child abuse including sexual.
- I do NOT trust or believe in armed police
- I do NOT believe in prolonging human life beyond reasonable expectation of sentient participatory intellectual existence
- I believe in EUTHENASIA under clearly defined & legal terms
- I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual
Re-TWEET my Twitterings
thanks for the links, as I am sure they will be of help to readers with an interest in the joys of urology and particularly prostate problems (like myself! having just had a consequential TURP for VERY enlarged prostate which I am pleased to say showed up as merely BPH and cancer free when the biopsy of the removed tissue was completed).
Unfortunately some of your links require a pass for entry, but your main site comes up with ease – so much so that I may well copy parts of it onto this site with the relevant attribution assuming that is OK – just as I have left all your links visible.
The aim is to try to help and reassure as many people as possible.
Please delete my comment it’s not for you. Thanks.
I have received this request from Alaina Albert:
“Alaina Albert commented on Watch & Wait Prostate Cancer Policy Leads To 42% Fall In Treatment In USA …
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~ Watch & Wait Prostate Cancer Policy Leads To 42% Fall In Treatment In USA …
Please delete my comment it’s not for you. Thanks.”
To reassure myself her eMail was genuine I viewed her profile, which I believe is genuine, even if it does contadict her message to me and is as follows:
4 Progress Street Suite A-9 Edison, NJ 08820 908-754-9280
My name is Alaina Albert. I love to share different news, thoughts, beneficial links regarding urology Treatments and procedures.”
The original of this profile is: http://en.gravatar.com/urologycarecnju
I trust that she will be reassured that the link I provided was covered by me with the caveat:
‘Unfortunately some of your links require a pass for entry, but your main site comes up with ease – so much so that I may well copy parts of it onto this site with the relevant attribution assuming that is OK – just as I have left all your links visible.
The aim is to try to help and reassure as many people as possible’.
THUS: Alaina Albert can be reassured that only those she wishes to read her comment can do so as clearly although the main article is in the public domain she is unwilling to stand by her comments in public – she can be assured that I have not included her comment – merely a link to her password coded site and will thus only be read by those she wishes to read it.
I trust this satisfies her request to me.